The supposed 90-year-old shooter at the Holocaust Museum reportedly believes the official 9/11 story is false?

What's next? That he's also against the war in Iraq? That he believes evolution and global warming is a crock? He already supposedly expressed ';dangerous'; beliefs like being against the Federal Reserve, questioning aspect of the Holocaust, and being strongly pro gun rights. Shouldn't they also mention other dangerous thoughts like being ';anti-illegals?'; What about ';anti-abortion?'; How many convenient issues can the media created about this alleged shooter?





All his supposed Internet writings were deleted without a trace at once. You would think that they would preserve as evidence the elderly man writing the supposed ';antisemitic'; remarks on the internet to use as ';evidence.'; Could it be that everything was erased because they were made up to push an antisemitism angle? So that his family cannot use those pages as evidence of libel?





http://www.newser.com/story/61658/von-br鈥?/a>The supposed 90-year-old shooter at the Holocaust Museum reportedly believes the official 9/11 story is false?
He's a long time nut case. The guy's hateful views are well publiicized. I think his anti Semetic, racist views were more of a problem especially when coupled with rages and threats.The supposed 90-year-old shooter at the Holocaust Museum reportedly believes the official 9/11 story is false?
I told you he wasn't conservative.
He most likely is one of Rush Limbaugh's ditto heads.
David Koresh, a republican pedofile, roasted 100 of his children to death in 93.
You said:





';All his supposed Internet writings were deleted without a trace at once';.





The article said:





';His online presence remains viewable through caches and in archives like the Wayback Machine, proving once again that information on the Internet is nearly impossible to purge once posted.';





It's also obvious from the article that the entities pulling their articles are doing so in self-protection. No one wants to be associated with this creature.
Well apparently you believe it is a crock.





It is interesting how conspiracy type guys always overlook the obvious: Namely, no one really needs his website remarks for evidence because, you know, the cop he shot...


then there are the cops who shot him.





If that isn't enough. You know that he published a book, right?





I don't imagine they all disappeared.
';How many convenient issues can the media created about this alleged shooter? ';





Doesn't seem as though they had to create any.





';You would think that they would preserve as evidence the elderly man writing the supposed ';antisemitic'; remarks on the internet to use as ';evidence.';';





Most probably it was preserved, it just isn't available on the web anymore.





Do you think after he was shot, the media moved the Holocaust Museum to the scene to make him look like he was just a racist? Or maybe he carries his rifle with him everywhere and it was just bad luck it went off and killed a guard when he happened to be visiting the Museum?